WAC 173-153-130
How are records of decision and reports
of examination made by a water conservancy board? (1) Records
of decision and reports of examination are adopted by a
majority vote of a board, pursuant to RCW 90.80.070(4). A
board's record of decision and report of examination must be
in writing, and the record of decision and report of
examination become part of the public record.
(2) When a board proposes to deny an application, in
whole or in part, the board must issue to both the applicant
and ecology a record of decision and report of examination
denying the transfer, or a portion of the transfer, subject to
review and final determination by ecology.
(3) When a board proposes to approve an application, the
board must issue to both the applicant and ecology a record of
decision and a report of examination approving the transfer,
subject to review and final approval by ecology.
What is included in a record of decision?
(4) The record of decision must be prepared on a form
provided by ecology and identified as the Record of Decision,
form number 040-105, and must include the conclusion of the
board as to whether the application is denied or approved and
a record of the individual vote or abstention of each
participating commissioner or that a commissioner has recused
him or herself.
What is included in a report of examination?
(5) It is the responsibility of the water conservancy
board to ensure that all relevant issues identified during its
evaluation of the application, or which are raised by any
commenting party during the board's evaluation process, are
thoroughly evaluated and discussed in the board's
deliberations. These discussions must be fully documented in
the report of examination.
(6) The report of examination will consist of a form
provided by ecology and identified as Water Conservancy Board
Report of Examination, form number 040-106, documenting and
summarizing the basic facts associated with the decision.
This shall include:
(a) Within a section entitled "background":
(i) A description of the water right proposed for
transfer, including the board-assigned water right change
application number, and the board's tentative determination as
to the validity and quantification of the right, as well as
the historical water use information that was considered by
the board;
(ii) An explanation of how the board complied with the
State Environmental Policy Act; and
(iii) A description of any previous change decisions
associated with the water right.
(b) Within a section entitled "comments and protests": A
description of any protests, and written or oral comments,
including:
(i) The names and addresses of the protestors or
commenters;
(ii) A description of the issues raised; and
(iii) The board's analysis regarding each issue raised.
(c) Within a section entitled "investigation":
(i) A description of the project proposed by the
applicant, including any issues related to development, such
as the applicant's proposed development schedule and an
analysis of the effect of the proposed transfer on other water
rights, pending applications for changes or transfers, and
instream flows established under state law;
(ii) A narrative description of any other water rights or
other water uses associated with both the current and proposed
place of use and an explanation of how those other rights or
uses will be exercised in conjunction with the right proposed
to be transferred;
(iii) If the proposed transfer is authorized under RCW 90.44.100, an analysis of the transfer as to whether it is
detrimental to the public interest, including impacts on any
watershed planning activity. Public interest shall not be
considered if the proposed transfer is authorized pursuant to
RCW 90.03.380 exclusively;
(iv) Any information indicating that an existing water
right or portion of a water right has been relinquished or
abandoned due to nonuse and the basis for the determination;
(v) A description of the results of any geologic,
hydrogeologic, or other scientific investigations that were
considered by the board and how this information contributed
to the board's conclusions;
(d) Within a section entitled "conclusions": A list of
conclusions that the board drew from the information compiled
regarding the transfer proposal. Conclusions must, at a
minimum, describe:
(i) Whether, and to what extent, a valid water right
exists;
(ii) Any relinquishment or abandonment of the water right
associated with the water right transfer application as
discussed in subsection (6)(d)(i) of this section;
(iii) The result, as adopted by the board, of any
hydraulic analysis done related to the proposed water right
transfer;
(iv) The board's conclusions of issues raised by any
comments and protests received;
(v) Whether the transfer proposal will impair existing
rights of others; and
(vi) If the proposed transfer is authorized pursuant to
RCW 90.44.100, whether it is detrimental to the public
interest. Public interest shall not be considered if the
proposed transfer is authorized pursuant to RCW 90.03.380
exclusively;
(e) Within a section entitled "decision": A complete
description of the board's decision, fully and comprehensively
addressing the entire application proposal;
(f) Within a section entitled "provisions":
(i) Any conditions and limitations recommended as part of
an approved transfer, and/or any other corrective action
necessary to maintain the water use in compliance with state
laws and regulations;
(ii) Any requirement to mitigate adverse effects of the
project. Mitigation may be proposed by the applicant or the
board and be required in the board's decision; and
(iii) A schedule for development and completion of the
water right transfer, if approved in part or in whole, that
includes a definite date for completion of the transfer and
application of the water to an authorized beneficial use.
(7) Ecology may request additional information from the water conservancy board regarding the
application and the board's decision, in addition to the
requirements of subsection (6) of this section.
(8) A board's record of decision must clearly state that
the applicant is not permitted to proceed to act on the
proposal until ecology makes a final decision affirming, in
whole or in part, the board's recommendation. However, if
ecology does not act on a board's recommendation within the
time frame established in RCW 90.80.080, the applicant is
allowed to initiate the water right transfer pursuant to the
board's record of decision after that period of time has
expired. It is advised that the applicant not proceed until
the appeal period of ecology's decision is complete, in
compliance with WAC 173-153-180.
[Statutory Authority: RCW 90.80.040. 06-18-102 (Order
05-18), § 173-153-130, filed 9/6/06, effective 10/7/06;
03-01-039 (Order 01-13), § 173-153-130, filed 12/9/02,
effective 1/9/03. Statutory Authority: Chapter 90.80 RCW. 99-23-101 (Order 98-11), § 173-153-130, filed 11/17/99,
effective 12/18/99.]